No need for any comments, this documentary speaks loud enough...
The hidden faces of Globalization - Part 1:
The hidden faces of Globalization - Part 2:
The hidden faces of Globalization - Part 3:
The hidden faces of Globalization - Part 4:
Who is benefiting from the globalization? Certainly not the poor people exploited in the process of increasing productivity and profits of the now global corporations.
Are we, western consumers, participants of this "global abuse"? Do we have the courage to face this reality and if so, the courage to face the consequences of making change in our lifestyle so this global injustice would not be supported/entertained by our dollars/consumerism?
According to a Homeland Security report (done under the supervision of Janet Napolitano, United States Secretary of Homeland Security, and the collaboration of the FBI) distributed in 2009 to law enforcement organizations, abortion opponents are as great a threat to national security in the immediate future as white supremacists.
The nine-page document was sent to police and sheriff's departments
across the country on April 7 under the headline, "Rightwing Extremism:
Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in
Radicalization and Recruitment." The report is unclassified, but is
accompanied by a warning that says it “contains information that may be
exempt from public release under the Freedom of Information Act.”
In this report, groups are identified as possible higher risk for domestic terrorist threat. Groups such as:
Returning veterans
individuals who stand against abortion and same-sex marriage
individuals who are against the government, and against government infringement on civil liberties
individuals who believe in anti government conspiracy theories
individuals who believe in “end times” prophecies, such as violent Christian Identity organizations and extremist members of the militia movement
here is a link to this Homeland Security report:
http://www.fas.org/irp/eprint/rightwing.pdf
FEMA officers teach founding father are terrorists because they were christians.
Here is a video taken in Oklahoma, at a meeting where a FEMA representative teach the local police that the founding fathers were terrorists during training classes:
For more evidence of this, you can
read more about FEMA’s teachings in this following document. It is an
"Instructor Guide" treating the topic of History of violence and
terrorism in the United States. This document can be downloaded here (directly
from the FEMA agency website):
Here is an article, written by an "insider" about the trainings and teachings that the law enforcement receive, and who is considered domestic terrorist threat.
Beware of Homeland Security Training for Local Law Enforcement, by An Insider
Wednesday, Mar 30, 2011
I’ve been in law enforcement for the past 18 years. I have attended a
variety of training over those years. During the 1990s, most training I
attended was community-oriented, sponsored by local agencies or private
companies specializing in police training. Themes common to training
of the past included topics such as Constitutional rights, community
partnerships, youth-oriented programs and problem-oriented policing.
During the past several years, I have witnessed a dramatic shift in
the focus of law enforcement training. Law enforcement courses have
moved away from a local community focus to a federally dominated model
of complete social control. Most training I have attended over the past
two years have been sponsored by Department of Homeland Security (DHS), namely the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).
No matter what topic the training session concerns, every DHS
sponsored course I have attended over the past few years never fails to
branch off into warnings about potential domestic terrorists in the
community. While this may sound like a valid officer and community
safety issue, you may be disturbed to learn how our Federal government
describes a typical domestic terrorist.
These federal trainers describe the dangers of “extremists” and
“militia groups” roaming the community and hiding in plain sight, ready
to attack. Officers are instructed how to recognize these domestic
terrorists by their behavior, views and common characteristics. State
data bases are kept to track suspected domestic terrorists and officers
are instructed on reporting procedures to state and federal agencies.
The state I work in, like many others, have what is known as a “fusion
center” that compiles a watch list of suspicious people.
So how does a person qualify as a potential domestic terrorist?
Based on the training I have attended, here are characteristics that
qualify:
Expressions of libertarian philosophies (statements, bumper stickers)
Second Amendment-oriented views (NRA or gun club membership, holding a CCW permit)
Survivalist literature (fictional books such as "Patriots" and "One
Second After" are mentioned by name)
Self-sufficiency (stockpiling food, ammo, hand tools, medical supplies)
Fear of economic collapse (buying gold and barter items)
Religious views concerning the book of Revelation (apocalypse, anti-Christ)
Expressed fears of Big Brother or big government
Homeschooling
Declarations of Constitutional rights and civil liberties
Belief in a New World Order conspiracy
A recent training session I attended encouraged law enforcement
agencies to work with business owners to alert police when customers
appear to be stockpiling items. An example was given that a federal
agent was monitoring customers at a well known hunting and fishing
retail outlet and noting who was purchasing certain items. This is
something to remember the next time you purchase a case of ammo at one
of these popular outdoor sports retail stores.
Methods of developing evidence of terrorist activity from virtually
any search have also been discussed. Various common materials which may
be associated with homemade explosives are listed, such as lengths of
pipe, gunpowder, matches, flammable liquids and fireworks. Officers are
told when these items are found, they can be listed as “bomb making
materials”. The training even goes so far as to instruct officers that
the items are cleverly disguised as legitimate, such as gasoline stored
near a lawn mower, pipes stored in a shop building or gunpowder stored
with reloading materials.
One course I attended used the example of a person employed as a
plumber being the target of a search warrant. In this example, the
officers were told how to use his employment as a plumber as further
evidence of terrorism. The suspect’s employment would be described as
an elaborate scheme to justify possessing pipes and chemicals so as to
have bomb making materials readily available. Based on this example,
all plumbers are potential pipe bomb makers. All gun dealers are
plotting to provide arms to gangs or terrorists. All pest control
companies are preparing mass poisonings. By using this logic, simply
having the ability to do something criminal automatically makes the
person guilty of plotting the crime. With all the various methods of
manufacturing methamphetamine, it would also be easy to claim that a
disassembled clandestine drug lab was located during the search. In
other words, it is easy to frame anyone for possessing bomb making
materials (or other crimes) if the officer knows what items to list in
the report and how to link these items to terrorism.
Another common tactic used in DHS sponsored training is the slander
of certain ideologies by linking an erroneous characteristic to a
particular group. Here are some examples:
These groups hold the anniversaries of certain dates as significant such a Ruby Ridge, Waco and Hitler’s birthday
They oppose abortion, support gun rights and are affiliated with the Ku Klux Klan
They are fearful of big government, espouse support for the Constitution and want to kill police officers
These groups collect firearms, survivalist books and explosives
These extremists read books such as Patriots, One Second After and The Anarchist Cookbook
They are religious zealots, reading the book of Revelation, speak
of the second coming of Christ and plan mass murders to summon the end
of the world
These people grow their own food, raise livestock and plot attacks on commercial food production facilities
Do you see how this tactic works? List common characteristics of
libertarian/conservative minded people, then throw in a slanderous
accusation. If A and B apply, then you should automatically presume C
applies as well. If they were disturbed by the incidents at Ruby Ridge
and Waco, then obviously they must celebrate Hitler’s birthday.
Officers are being conditioned to assume criminal and terroristic views
when politically-incorrect views are observed. As simple-minded and
ridiculous as this line of thinking is, there are some officers who
unfortunately buy into this.
Another training session I attended two years ago discussed the
dangerous of people who have strong views of the U.S. Constitution. One
trainer made the statement that “these people actually believe the
Second Amendment gives them the personal right to own a gun.” Of
course, the trainer failed to mention that our Founding Fathers, as well
as recent Supreme Court rulings, verify this view as being completely
accurate. The obvious attempt here was to suggest to officers that the
Second Amendment does not apply to individual gun ownership and to be
suspicious of anyone who holds such a view. It was also stressed to be
cautious of anyone who quotes the Constitution and even worse, actually
possesses a copy of this radical document. Incredibly, in the United
States of America today belief in our founding legal principles is now
grounds for being labeled a domestic terrorism. Imagine how they would
respond to some of the known statements of Thomas Jefferson, Patrick
Henry or George Mason concerning the issue of individual liberty and
limited government. It is true that one man’s terrorist is another
man’s freedom fighter.
There are several things that we, the patriotic, self-sufficient
defenders of liberty can do to counter this effort. First, get involved
in local elections. Elect county sheriffs who will not fall for such
propaganda nor go along with oppressive federal agendas. Elect city
council members who will not tolerate such behavior by their city police
department. Elect state representatives who will hold state agencies
accountable for participating in such tactics. Bring these issues up
during elections, demand a public statement on their position on such
propaganda and a promise to stand against these efforts while in office.
Second, get to know your local law enforcement officers. It is much
more difficult for DHS to brainwash officers against people they
personally know. When you are viewed as a neighbor, friend or fellow
Christian, these officers are far less likely to submit your name to a
terrorist watch list or view you as a potential terrorist. We want
local officers to be personally offended when they hear members of their
community slandered in such ways.
Third, always be friendly and courteous when speaking to your local
officers. Even if that officer has fallen for this propaganda, be sure
not to resemble the negative stereotypes labeled to us. After the
fifth, sixth or maybe tenth time he deals with one of us, he or she may
come to realize we are of no threat to law enforcement or anyone for
that matter. Eventually, the officer may attend one of these training
sessions, hear the propaganda and say to himself, “This isn’t true, I’ve
dealt with many people like this, they are God-fearing, liberty loving
Americans, they are not the enemy!”
I hope you find this information useful. Please remember that there
are many people in law enforcement that have not, and will never, fall
for DHS propaganda. Some of the most patriotic defenders of liberty and
believers in self-sufficiency can be found in law enforcement.
Officers like me will continue to do our part to fight tyranny from
within while the general public can do its part by electing
liberty-minded candidates to office and educating their friends and
neighbors about issues important to all of us.
source of the article: http://www.survivalblog.com/2011/03/beware_of_homeland_security_tr.html
“‘We
have agreed to support a general SDR allocation which will inject
$250bn (£170bn) into the world economy and increase global liquidity,’
it said. SDRs are Special Drawing Rights, a synthetic paper currency
issued by the International Monetary Fund that has lain dormant for half
a century.
“In
effect, the G20 leaders have activated the IMF’s power to create money
and begin global ‘quantitative easing’. In doing so, they are putting a
de facto world currency into play. It is outside the control of any
sovereign body. Conspiracy theorists will love it.”
Indeed they will. The
article is subtitled, “The world is a step closer to a global currency,
backed by a global central bank, running monetary policy for all
humanity.” Which naturally
raises the question, who or what will serve as this global central bank,
cloaked with the power to issue the global currency and police monetary
policy for all humanity? When
the world’s central bankers met in Washington last September, they
discussed what body might be in a position to serve in that awesome and
fearful role. A former governor of the Bank of England stated:
“The
answer might already be staring us in the face, in the form of the Bank
for International Settlements (BIS). . . . The IMF tends to couch its
warnings about economic problems in very diplomatic language, but the
BIS is more independent and much better placed to deal with this if it
is given the power to do so.”1
And
if the vision of a global currency outside government control does not
set off conspiracy theorists, putting the BIS in charge of it surely
will. The BIS has been scandal-ridden ever since it was branded with pro-Nazi leanings in the 1930s. Founded
in Basel, Switzerland, in 1930, the BIS has been called “the most
exclusive, secretive, and powerful supranational club in the world.” Charles Higham wrote in his book Trading with the Enemy
that by the late 1930s, the BIS had assumed an openly pro-Nazi bias, a
theme that was expanded on in a BBC Timewatch film titled “Banking with
Hitler” broadcast in 1998.2 In
1944, the American government backed a resolution at the Bretton-Woods
Conference calling for the liquidation of the BIS, following Czech
accusations that it was laundering gold stolen by the Nazis from
occupied Europe; but the central bankers succeeded in quietly snuffing
out the American resolution.3
Modest beginnings, BIS Office, Hotel Savoy-Univers, Basel
First Annual General Meeting, 1931 In Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in Our Time (1966), Dr. Carroll Quigley revealed the key role played in global finance by the BIS behind the scenes. Dr. Quigley was Professor of History at Georgetown University, where he was President Bill Clinton’s mentor. He was also an insider, groomed by the powerful clique he called “the international bankers.” His credibility is heightened by the fact that he actually espoused their goals. He wrote:
“I
know of the operations of this network because I have studied it for
twenty years and was permitted for two years, in the early 1960's, to
examine its papers and secret records. I have no aversion to it or to
most of its aims and have, for much of my life, been close to it and to
many of its instruments. . . . In general my chief difference of
opinion is that it wishes to remain unknown, and I believe its role in
history is significant enough to be known.”
Quigley wrote of this international banking network:
“The
powers of financial capitalism had another far-reaching aim, nothing
less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands
able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy
of the world as a whole. This
system was to be controlled in a feudalist fashion by the central banks
of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in
frequent private meetings and conferences. The
apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in
Basel, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world’s
central banks which were themselves private corporations.”
The key to their success, said Quigley, was that the
international bankers would control and manipulate the money system of a
nation while letting it appear to be controlled by the government. The
statement echoed one made in the eighteenth century by the patriarch of
what would become the most powerful banking dynasty in the world. Mayer Amschel Bauer Rothschild famously said in 1791:
“Allow me to issue and control a nation’s currency, and I care not who makes its laws.”
Mayer’s
five sons were sent to the major capitals of Europe – London, Paris,
Vienna, Berlin and Naples – with the mission of establishing a banking
system that would be outside government control. The economic and political systems of nations would be controlled not by citizens but by bankers, for the benefit of bankers. Eventually,
a privately-owned “central bank” was established in nearly every
country; and this central banking system has now gained control over the
economies of the world. Central
banks have the authority to print money in their respective countries,
and it is from these banks that governments must borrow money to pay
their debts and fund their operations. The
result is a global economy in which not only industry but government
itself runs on “credit” (or debt) created by a banking monopoly headed
by a network of private central banks; and at the top of this network is
the BIS, the “central bank of central banks” in Basel.
Behind the Curtain
For many years the BIS kept a very low profile, operating behind the scenes in an abandoned hotel. It
was here that decisions were reached to devalue or defend currencies,
fix the price of gold, regulate offshore banking, and raise or lower
short-term interest rates. In 1977, however, the BIS gave up its anonymity in exchange for more efficient headquarters. The
new building has been described as “an eighteen story-high circular
skyscraper that rises above the medieval city like some misplaced
nuclear reactor.” It quickly became known as the “Tower of Basel.” Today the BIS has governmental immunity, pays no taxes, and has its own private police force.4 It is, as Mayer Rothschild envisioned, above the law.
The
BIS is now composed of 55 member nations, but the club that meets
regularly in Basel is a much smaller group; and even within it, there is
a hierarchy. In a 1983 article in Harper’s Magazine
called “Ruling the World of Money,” Edward Jay Epstein wrote that where
the real business gets done is in “a sort of inner club made up of the
half dozen or so powerful central bankers who find themselves more or
less in the same monetary boat” – those from Germany, the United States,
Switzerland, Italy, Japan and England. Epstein said:
“The
prime value, which also seems to demarcate the inner club from the rest
of the BIS members, is the firm belief that central banks should act
independently of their home governments. . . . A second and closely
related belief of the inner club is that politicians should not be
trusted to decide the fate of the international monetary system.”
In
1974, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision was created by the
central bank Governors of the Group of Ten nations (now expanded to
twenty). The BIS provides the twelve-member Secretariat for the Committee. The Committee, in turn, sets the rules for banking globally, including capital requirements and reserve controls. In a 2003 article titled “The Bank for International Settlements Calls for Global Currency,” Joan Veon wrote:
“The
BIS is where all of the world’s central banks meet to analyze the
global economy and determine what course of action they will take next
to put more money in their pockets, since they control the amount of
money in circulation and how much interest they are going to charge
governments and banks for borrowing from them. . . .
“When
you understand that the BIS pulls the strings of the world’s monetary
system, you then understand that they have the ability to create a
financial boom or bust in a country. If that country is not doing what the money lenders want, then all they have to do is sell its currency.”5
The Controversial Basel Accords
The
power of the BIS to make or break economies was demonstrated in 1988,
when it issued a Basel Accord raising bank capital requirements from 6%
to 8%. By then, Japan had
emerged as the world’s largest creditor; but Japan’s banks were less
well capitalized than other major international banks. Raising
the capital requirement forced them to cut back on lending, creating a
recession in Japan like that suffered in the U.S. today. Property prices fell and loans went into default as the security for them shriveled up. A downward spiral followed, ending with the total bankruptcy of the banks. The banks had to be nationalized, although that word was not used in order to avoid criticism.6
Among other collateral damage produced by the Basel Accords was a spate of suicides among Indian farmers unable to get loans. The
BIS capital adequacy standards required loans to private borrowers to
be “risk-weighted,” with the degree of risk determined by private rating
agencies; and farmers and small business owners could not afford the
agencies’ fees. Banks therefore
assigned 100 percent risk to the loans, and then resisted extending
credit to these “high-risk” borrowers because more capital was required
to cover the loans. When the
conscience of the nation was aroused by the Indian suicides, the
government, lamenting the neglect of farmers by commercial banks,
established a policy of ending the “financial exclusion” of the weak;
but this step had little real effect on lending practices, due largely
to the strictures imposed by the BIS from abroad.7
Similar complaints have come from Korea. An article in the December 12, 2008 Korea Times
titled “BIS Calls Trigger Vicious Cycle” described how Korean
entrepreneurs with good collateral cannot get operational loans from
Korean banks, at a time when the economic downturn requires increased
investment and easier credit:
“‘The
Bank of Korea has provided more than 35 trillion won to banks since
September when the global financial crisis went full throttle,’ said a
Seoul analyst, who declined to be named. ‘But the effect is not seen at all with the banks keeping the liquidity in their safes. They simply don’t lend and one of the biggest reasons is to keep the BIS ratio high enough to survive,’ he said. . . .
“Chang Ha-joon, an economics professor at Cambridge University, concurs with the analyst. ‘What banks do for their own interests, or to improve the BIS ratio, is against the interests of the whole society. This is a bad idea,’ Chang said in a recent telephone interview with Korea Times.
In a May 2002 article in The Asia Times
titled “Global Economy: The BIS vs. National Banks,” economist Henry C K
Liu observed that the Basel Accords have forced national banking
systems “to
march to the same tune, designed to serve the needs of highly
sophisticated global financial markets, regardless of the developmental
needs of their national economies.” He wrote:
“[N]ational
banking systems are suddenly thrown into the rigid arms of the Basel
Capital Accord sponsored by the Bank of International Settlement (BIS),
or to face the penalty of usurious risk premium in securing
international interbank loans. . . . National policies suddenly are
subjected to profit incentives of private financial institutions, all
members of a hierarchical system controlled and directed from the money
center banks in New York. The result is to force national banking
systems to privatize . . . .
“BIS
regulations serve only the single purpose of strengthening the
international private banking system, even at the peril of national
economies. . . . The IMF and the international banks regulated by the
BIS are a team: the international banks lend recklessly to borrowers in
emerging economies to create a foreign currency debt crisis, the IMF
arrives as a carrier of monetary virus in the name of sound monetary
policy, then the international banks come as vulture investors in the
name of financial rescue to acquire national banks deemed capital
inadequate and insolvent by the BIS.”
Ironically,
noted Liu, developing countries with their own natural resources did
not actually need the foreign investment that trapped them in debt to
outsiders:
“Applying
the State Theory of Money [which assumes that a sovereign nation has
the power to issue its own money], any government can fund with its own
currency all its domestic developmental needs to maintain full
employment without inflation.”
When
governments fall into the trap of accepting loans in foreign
currencies, however, they become “debtor nations” subject to IMF and BIS
regulation. They are forced to
divert their production to exports, just to earn the foreign currency
necessary to pay the interest on their loans. National
banks deemed “capital inadequate” have to deal with strictures
comparable to the “conditionalities” imposed by the IMF on debtor
nations: “escalating capital requirement, loan writeoffs and
liquidation, and restructuring through selloffs, layoffs, downsizing,
cost-cutting and freeze on capital spending.” Liu wrote:
“Reversing
the logic that a sound banking system should lead to full employment
and developmental growth, BIS regulations demand high unemployment and
developmental degradation in national economies as the fair price for a
sound global private banking system.”
The Last Domino to Fall
While
banks in developing nations were being penalized for falling short of
the BIS capital requirements, large international banks managed to
escape the rules, although they actually carried enormous risk because
of their derivative exposure. The
mega-banks succeeded in avoiding the Basel rules by separating the
“risk” of default out from the loans and selling it off to investors,
using a form of derivative known as “credit default swaps.”
BIS Tower Building, Basel
Botta 1 Building, Basel However, it was not in the game plan that U.S. banks should escape the BIS net. When they managed to sidestep the first Basel Accord, a second set of rules was imposed known as Basel II. The
new rules were established in 2004, but they were not levied on U.S.
banks until November 2007, the month after the Dow passed 14,000 to
reach its all-time high. It has been all downhill from there. Basel II had the same effect on U.S. banks that Basel I had on Japanese banks: they have been struggling ever since to survive.8
Basel
II requires banks to adjust the value of their marketable securities to
the “market price” of the security, a rule called “mark to market.”9 The rule has theoretical merit, but the problem is timing: it was imposed ex post facto, after the banks already had the hard-to-market assets on their books. Lenders that had been considered sufficiently well capitalized to make new loans suddenly found they were insolvent. At least, they would have been insolvent if they had tried to sell their assets, an assumption required by the new rule. Financial analyst John Berlau complained:
“The
crisis is often called a ‘market failure,’ and the term
‘mark-to-market’ seems to reinforce that. But the mark-to-market rules
are profoundly anti-market and hinder the free-market function of price
discovery. . . . In this case, the accounting rules fail to allow the
market players to hold on to an asset if they don’t like what the market
is currently fetching, an important market action that affects price
discovery in areas from agriculture to antiques.”10
Imposing
the mark-to-market rule on U.S. banks caused an instant credit freeze,
which proceeded to take down the economies not only of the U.S. but of
countries worldwide. In early
April 2009, the mark-to-market rule was finally softened by the U.S.
Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB); but critics said the
modification did not go far enough, and it was done in response to
pressure from politicians and bankers, not out of any fundamental change
of heart or policies by the BIS.
And that is where the conspiracy theorists come in. Why did the BIS not retract or at least modify Basel II after seeing the devastation it had caused? Why did it sit idly by as the global economy came crashing down? Was
the goal to create so much economic havoc that the world would rush
with relief into the waiting arms of the BIS with its privately-created
global currency? The plot thickens . . . .
Ellen Brown developed her research skills as an attorney practicing civil litigation in Los Angeles. In Web of Debt,
her latest book, she turns those skills to an analysis of the Federal
Reserve and “the money trust.” She shows how this private cartel has
usurped the power to create money from the people themselves, and how we
the people can get it back. Her earlier books focused on the
pharmaceutical cartel that gets its power from “the money trust.” Her
eleven books include Forbidden Medicine, Nature’s Pharmacy (co-authored with Dr. Lynne Walker), and The Key to Ultimate Health (co-authored with Dr. Richard Hansen). Her websites are www.webofdebt.com and www.ellenbrown.com.
NOTES 1. Andrew Marshall, “The Financial New World Order: Towards a Global Currency and World Government,” Global Research (April 6, 2009).
I will begin this page with the declaration of Mr Von Rompuy, president of the European Council:
We will then let the words speak for themselves:
"We shall have world government whether or not you like it, by
conquest or consent." - Statement by Council on Foreign Relations (CFR)
member James Warburg to The Senate Foreign Relations Committee on
February 17th, l950
"The world is governed by very different personages from what
is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes." - Benjamin
Disraeli, first Prime Minister of England, in a novel he published in
1844 called Coningsby, the New Generation
"Since I entered politics, I have chiefly had men's views
confided to me privately. Some of the biggest men in the United
States, in the Field of commerce and manufacture, are afraid of
something. They know that there is a power somewhere so organized, so
subtle, so watchful, so interlocked, so complete, so pervasive, that
they better not speak above their breath when they speak in
condemnation of it." - Woodrow Wilson, The New Freedom (1913)
"The case for government by elites is irrefutable."
- Senator William Fulbright, Former chairman of the US Senate Foreign
Relations Committee, stated at a 1963 symposium entitled: The Elite
and the Electorate - Is Government by the People Possible?
"The Trilateral Commission is intended to be the vehicle for
multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by
seizing control of the political government of the United States. The
Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to
seize control and consolidate the four centers of power political,
monetary, intellectual and ecclesiastical. What the Trilateral
Commission intends is to create a worldwide economic power superior to
the political governments of the nationstates involved. As managers
and creators of the system, they will rule the future." - U.S.
Senator Barry Goldwater in his l964 book: With No Apologies.
"The Council on Foreign Relations is "the
establishment." Not only does it have influence and power in key
decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply
pressure from above, but it also announces and uses individuals and
groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level
decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitutional
Republic into a servile member state of a one-world
dictatorship." - Former Congressman John Rarick 1971
"The New World Order will have to be built from the bottom up
rather than from the top down...but in the end run around national
sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece will accomplish much more than
the old fashioned frontal assault." CFR member Richard Gardner,
writing in the April l974 issue of the CFR's journal, Foreign Affairs.
The globalists and their agenda, watch these series of 4 amazing videos:
A lot of time when people hear about a one world
government or the new world order, they tend to put those concepts into the category "conspiracy theory".
Now where does this idea come from? Who has been talking
about a one world government in the first place? Who used the terms "new world order" and "global governance" first?
I will try to bring answers to these questions on this page.
I believe thatan elite
of international bankers and politicians have shared a common vision: the
establishment of an international order where all nations will be ruled by one
political and economical institution under their control. In this page you will
read and hear (in their own words) about their desire to bring a one world government.
If you believe that my later statement is unfounded and
false, but you are not willing to take the time to examine the following elements
presented to you in this page, how can you expect possess accurate and
honest opinions when you refuse to go on the path of objective investigation and examine
facts that are in the light for all to see…?
As Einstein stated so well, "Condemnation without investigation is the height of ignorance."
Before listening to
the pro-world government, let’s begin our quest for understanding with an
opponent, Congressman Larry McDonald.
"The drive of the Rockefellers and their allies is to create a one-world government combining supercapitalism
and Communism under the same tent, all under their control.... Do I mean
conspiracy? Yes I do. I am convinced there is such a plot, international in
scope, generations old in planning, and incredibly evil in intent."
Congressman Larry P. McDonald, 1976
He was later killed when on route to North Korea; when his
plane (KAL 007) was shot down by a Russian jetfighter.
Here in this amazing video, Congressman Larry McDonald is
exposing the elite’s agenda: the establishment of a world government.
Now what does David Rockefeller (founder of the CFR and the
Trilateral commission, and co-founder of the Bilderberg Group) have to say
about conspiracy?
"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York
Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended
our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years.
It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we
had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the
work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world
government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world
bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in
past centuries." - David Rockefeller, in an address to a meeting of The Trilateral Commission, in June,
1991.
“Some even believe we (the Rockefeller family) are part of a
secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States,
characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with
others around the world to build a more integrated global political and
economic structure – one world, if you will. If that's the charge, I stand
guilty, and I am proud of it.” - David Rockefeller, Memoirs, page 405
What some well experienced and influential
figures have to say about who holds the true power to set the course of our
nations:
"The real truth of the matter is, as you and I know,
that a financial element in the large centers has owned the government of the
U.S. since the days of Andrew Jackson." - U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt in a letter written Nov. 21, 1933 to
Colonel E. Mandell House
Felix Frankfurter, Justice of the Supreme Court (1939-1962),
said: "The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from
behind the scenes."
February 23, 1954, Senator William Jenner warned in a
speech: "Outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating
within our government and political system, another body representing another
form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is
outmoded."
Baron M.A. Rothschild wrote, "Give me control over a
nation's currency and I care not who makes its laws."
Some agree that all that is needed to
effectively control a government is to have control over the nation's money: a
central bank with a monopoly over the supply of money and credit. This had been
done in Western Europe, with the creation of privately owned central banks such
as the Bank of England.
Georgetown professor Dr. Carroll Quigley (Bill
Clinton's mentor while at Georgetown) wrote about the goals of the investment
bankers who control central banks: "... nothing less than to create a
world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the
political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole...
controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in
concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent private meetings and
conferences."
The Bank of the United States (1816-36), an
early attempt at an American central bank, was abolished by President Andrew
Jackson, who believed that it threatened the nation. He wrote: "The bold
effort the present bank had made to control the government, the distress it had
wantonly produced...are but premonitions of the fate that awaits the American
people should they be deluded into a perpetuation of this institution or the
establishment of another like it."
Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The Central Bank
is an institution of the most deadly hostility existing against the principles
and form of our Constitution...if the American people allow private banks to
control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by
deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will
deprive the people of all their property until their children will wake up
homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."
Now read carefully the following.
The U.S. managed to do without a central bank
until early in this century, when, according to Congressman Charles Lindbergh,
Sr., "The Money Trust caused the 1907 panic, and thereby forced Congress
to create a National Monetary Commission." Headed by Senator Nelson
Aldrich, father-in-law of John D. Rockefeller, Jr., the Commission recommended
creation of a central bank.
Though unconstitutional, as only "The
Congress shall have Power...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof..."
(Article I, Section 8, U.S. Constitution) the Federal Reserve Act was passed in
December 1913; ostensibly to stabilize the economy and prevent further panics,
but as Lindberg warned Congress: "This act establishes the most gigantic
trust on earth...the invisible government by the money power, proven to exist
by the Money Trust investigation, will be legalized." The Great Depression
and numerous recessions later, it is obvious the Federal Reserve produces
inflation and federal debt whenever it desires, but not stability.
Congressman Louis McFadden, House Committee on
Banking and Currency Chairman (1920-31), stated: "When the Federal Reserve
Act was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world
banking system was being set up here. A super-state controlled by international
bankers and industrialists...acting together to enslave the world...Every
effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers but the truth is--the Fed
has usurped the government."
“It is well enough that people of the nation do
not understand our banking and monetary system, for if they did, I believe
there would be a revolution before tomorrow morning.” - Henry Ford
"The few who understand the system, will
either be so interested from it's profits or so dependent on it's favors, that
there will be no opposition from that class." - Mayer Amschel Bauer
Rothschild
“Bankers own the earth; take it away from them
but leave them with the power to create credit; and, with a flick of a pen,
they will create enough money to buy it back again... If you want to be slaves
of bankers and pay the cost of your own slavery, then let the bankers control
money and control credit.” - Sir Josiah Stamp, Director, Bank of England, 1940.
"I see in the near future a crisis approaching
that unnerves me and causes me to tremble for the safety of my country. As a
result of the war, corporations have been enthroned and an era of corruption in
high places will follow, and the money power of the country will endeavor to
prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people until all wealth
is aggregated in a few hands, and the Republic is destroyed. I feel at this
moment more anxiety for the safety of my country than ever before, even in the
midst of war." - Abraham Lincoln - In a letter written to William Elkin
"In the next century, nations as we know
it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority.
National sovereignty wasn't such a great idea after all." - Strobe Talbot, President Clinton's Deputy Secretary of State, Time Magazine,
July 20th, l992
Are all these men conspiracy theorists to be
ignored, or are these men speaking about a reality that has been intentionally covered
up, for obvious reasons…? You tell me.
Comparison between a European Union poster, a painting by Pieter Brueghel called "The Tower of Babel", and the European parliament building in Strasbourg.
To encourage support for the EU, the Council of Europe published a poster in 1992 identifying Europe with the rebuilding of Babel!
Modelled on Pieter Brueghel's famous 16th century painting "The Tower Of Babel", the poster shows the peoples of Europe rebuilding the tower that God destroyed in Genesis 11:5-9.
And the LORD came down to see the city and the tower, which the children of men builded. And the LORD said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do: and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech. So the LORD scattered them abroad from thence upon the face of all the earth: and they left off to build the city. Therefore is the name of it called Babel; because the LORD did there confound the language of all the earth: and from thence did the LORD scatter them abroad upon the face of all the earth."
Note the statement shown on the poster "Many Tongues One Voice", inverts God's judgement on Babel. Note also that the normal European stars have been inverted to a pentagram.
This is the original 16th century painting and below is the finished Strasbourg EU Building.
